Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 14:38
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 55.5
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 70.8
36% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 185
18% 147 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 376C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 361.75
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 5.6
0% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$79
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 64 68 68 60 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 26.3
Write 112
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 61.7
37% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5474-038.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 31 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3577 HP 24m
Typical GA-H81M-S2PV Builds (Compare 2,218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback