Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory16.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 19:07
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 201
67% 122 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 603
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$243
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.9% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 112
Parallax 87.6
82% 100 fps
MRender 80.9
Gravity 71
Splatting 62.5
58% 71.5 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$24
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 399
Mixed 8.5
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 5.3
36% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
264GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 237 174 69 78 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,140
Write 1,173
Mixed 1,154
SusWrite 206
206% 918 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 51.2
165% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 635
DQ Mixed 724
537% 712 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 141%
Great: 394%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
638GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 165 165 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 160
Mixed 83
SusWrite 166
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GIS F4-3200C16-8GIS F4-3000C16-8GISB 24GB
1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 27" 1920 1080 AUS27EA VG27VQM
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback