Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-HD2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 15:11
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 89.1
41% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 89.6
8-Core 87.8
12% 88.7 Pts
64-Core 87.9
5% 87.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
AMD(1002 0123) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3.6
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 250GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 23 30 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 18
Write 42
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 27.9
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.5
423% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 32%
Ccboot iSCSI 500GB
250GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 35 32 31 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 67.7
Write 32.5
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 31.7
35% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.7
455% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773SB0- Hynix V-GeN D3H4GL1 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 26 60 18.5" 1280 720 DELF03B DELL IN1930
Typical GA-F2A58M-HD2 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback