HP Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 17:34
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 219
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 470
54% 421 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420
HP(103C 1162) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PC SN520 NVMe WDC 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20220012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 468 416 419 419 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,181
Write 1147
Mixed 950
SusWrite 429
208% 927 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 53.3
171% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 704
527% 706 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 159%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965745-028.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.5" 1920 1080 VSCDE2E VX2452 Series
Typical Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback