Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD7  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 14:08
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 137
54% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 265
30% 234 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 34 108 83 40 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.6% Poor
Read 124
Write 91.4
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 82.1
21% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 9.8
39% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 13.9
11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 100%
WD WD2500AAJB-00J3A0 250GB
48GB free
Firmware: 00.02C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 64.4
Write 65.6
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 53.8
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 45%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
430GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 121 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 117
Write 117
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 119
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 9 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2243 2243W
Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback