Today's hottest deals

Samsung 550XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 550XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XED-KF4BR
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 13:30
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 255
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 527
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 671
42% 671 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C878) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 13
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 12.8
12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 708 820 206 145 194 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,326
Write 1,094
Mixed 1,083
SusWrite 378
217% 970 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 57.8
198% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 700
505% 656 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 166%
Great: 196%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 1TB
604GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 105 91 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 120
Write 98
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 101
22% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
4% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 30.6
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 20.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 15.5" 1280 720 KDB0526
Typical 550XED Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 550XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback