Lenovo 21B9000LGM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 21B9000LGM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21B9000LGM
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220510
Uptime23.4 Days
Run DateJul 23 '23 at 21:27
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 104
43% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 231
26% 206 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50A2) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.40.52.12
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 3.7
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-4D1024-Q79 1TB
763GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4U279
SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 770 760 765 813 897 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,202
Write 913
Mixed 896
SusWrite 766
212% 944 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 25
102% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 234
160% 199 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 134%
Great: 250%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 13.3" 1280 720 LEN41A0
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback