Today's hottest deals

MSI B560M BOMBER (MS-7D20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive427% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D20
MotherboardMSI B560M BOMBER (MS-7D20)  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '23 at 11:14
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$168
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 165
2-Core 320
106% 193 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 937
96% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
MSI(1462 7D20) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
7.74% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 11.4
7% 11.8 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 9.4
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.74%
Great: 8%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Zotac(19DA 1704) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 178
Parallax 169
152% 178 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 137
Splatting 118
126% 161 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 135%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$113
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2606 3173 3076 2756 1613 1623 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
427% Outstanding
Read 2,606
Write 3,036
Mixed 2,971
SusWrite 2,475
627% 2,772 MB/s
4K Read 75.3
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 112
362% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1359
DQ Write 1,253
DQ Mixed 1,302
978% 1,304 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 427%
Great: 477%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1TB
471GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 130 127 128 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 198
Write 214
Mixed 143
SusWrite 128
228% 171 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
173% 3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 74%
External USB3.0 DISK01 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 127 126 128 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 99
Write 98.7
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 127
141% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 76%
External USB3.0 DISK02 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 3.3 2.5 0 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 186
Write 190
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 1.2
124% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
92% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 62%
External USB3.0 DISK03 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30% Poor
Read 164
Write 185
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 0.4
132% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK04 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 191
Write 198
Mixed 134
SusWrite 0.4
165% 131 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 1.6
389% 4.77 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 4.8
DQ Mixed 1.8
229% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 39
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 33.4
101% 35.4 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0B67 S27D390
Typical B560M BOMBER (MS-7D20) Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B560M BOMBER (MS-7D20)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback