Today's hottest deals

Samsung 550XED

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 550XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XED-KF4BR
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 22:37
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 66
1-Core 162
2-Core 282
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 607
72% 555 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C878) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 13.4
9% 13.2 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 14.6
14% 18.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,256
Write 1,077
Mixed 1,048
251% 1,127 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 69.2
243% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 1,042
DQ Mixed 775
622% 863 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 196%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 1TB
855GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 137
Write 113
Mixed 75.7
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.6
8% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 29.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 21.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 KDB0526
Typical 550XED Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 550XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback