Today's hottest deals

Asus M3N78-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M3N78-EM  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100910
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 16:40
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 27.2
2-Core 33.9
37% 47.5 Pts
4-Core 31
8-Core 39.6
4% 35.3 Pts
64-Core 33.3
2% 33.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.57% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 40 51 60 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.6% Below average
Read 174
Write 84
Mixed 141
SusWrite 49
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 17.9
59% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35.3
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 46.4
36% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
179GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 51 47 52 60 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 47.4
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 51.8
33% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.2
116% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: D785
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 64 73 86 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 93.5
Write 61.9
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 73.1
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 21 60 24.1" 1280 720 LEN1144 LEN LT2452pwC
Typical M3N78-EM Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3N78-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback