Infinix INBOOK X2 SLIM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemInfinix INBOOK X2 SLIM  (all builds)
MotherboardInfinix EM_TG325_200B_V1.0
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230315
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 04:37
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 62
1-Core 137
2-Core 230
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 346
47% 348 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 13.3
9% 14.4 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 13.4
12% 15 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee VP1000F256G 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 313 293 338 336 335 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,242
Write 1,194
Mixed 948
SusWrite 321
207% 926 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 49.9
183% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 416
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 119
150% 270 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 141%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53E1G32D4NQ-046WTE 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 28.6
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 15.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 14" 1296 759 TMX1398 TL140VDXP04-0
Typical INBOOK X2 SLIM Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Infinix INBOOK X2 SLIM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback