Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9470m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '23 at 18:49
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3437U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 69.2
40% 60 Pts
4-Core 93.4
8-Core 98.5
13% 95.9 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 960GB
737GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P220214b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 380 372 378 402 407 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 342
Write 290
Mixed 311
SusWrite 386
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 19.3
65% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 216
157% 205 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback