Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro16,4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,4  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-A61BADE1FDAD7B05
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 23:57
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 782
77% 631 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Apple(106B 021E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.44.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.9% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 76.3
46% 70.5 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 53.1
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP4096 4TB
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1290
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1271 1243 1124 1436 1420 1437 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 8% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB4GS6ABR8N-VK 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 26.4
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro16,4 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Apple MacBookPro16,4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback