AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory15.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 23:11
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 163
2-Core 320
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 838
86% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 32.8
18% 25.9 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 22
18% 21.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 209 53 53 49 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 1,541
Write 305
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 81.1
107% 503 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 5.4
110% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 473
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 847
473% 465 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 315%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
123GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 159
Write 85.6
Mixed 90
129% 112 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.8
162% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FF 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 28.5
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 27.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SER Builds (Compare 800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback