Today's hottest deals

HP 2000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 2000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1858
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 18:05
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2328M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 104
50% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 130
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 1858) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.56% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.56%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
256gb EVM SSD 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0608C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 286 372 385 342 339 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 357
Write 319
Mixed 314
SusWrite 344
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 15.1
66% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 36
66% 128 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
464GB free
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 78 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
44% Average
Read 76.6
Write 75.5
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 76.8
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 2000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback