Today's hottest deals

Asus WS C246M PRO Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus WS C246M PRO Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS C246M PRO Series
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 16:25
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$223
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 758
72% 594 Pts
64-Core 849
52% 849 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 9.3
5% 8.3 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTE652T2 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52B9T7OA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 144 142 144 142 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,597
Write 574
Mixed 734
SusWrite 144
167% 762 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 62.2
208% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 60.7
124% 253 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 153%
Great: 214%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$66
931GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 170 169 170 173 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 116
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 170
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GLH64V4B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 10
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS C246M PRO Series Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Asus WS C246M PRO Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback