Acer Nitro AN515-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Octavia_PKS
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 14:23
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 57.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 182
63% 114 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 566
55% 452 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 1366) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 20.4
11% 21.1 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 13.2
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 361 362 364 364 365 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 429
Mixed 404
SusWrite 364
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 34.9
132% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 228
171% 229 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 126%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 120 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 119
Write 103
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 118
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 22.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-43 Builds (Compare 1,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback