TIMI Redmi G 2022

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemTIMI Redmi G 2022  (all builds)
MotherboardTIMI TM2135
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '23 at 20:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 184
2-Core 362
107% 207 Pts
4-Core 663
8-Core 933
100% 798 Pts
64-Core 1332
82% 1332 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D72 2135) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3222
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 134
Parallax 19.5
15% 57.1 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 17.4
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
603GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2635 1365 1559 979 988 1069 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
405% Outstanding
Read 2,285
Write 2,742
Mixed 2,380
SusWrite 1,432
498% 2,210 MB/s
4K Read 86.6
4K Write 289
4K Mixed 128
448% 168 MB/s
DQ Read 2,097
DQ Write 1,847
DQ Mixed 1,941
1,464% 1,961 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 405%
Great: 591%
Phison CFESR512GMTCT-E9C-2 512GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM31.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,543
Write 2,892
Mixed 1,546
450% 1,994 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 321
4K Mixed 90.5
388% 160 MB/s
DQ Read 1,452
DQ Write 1,438
DQ Mixed 1,434
1,080% 1,441 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) PSD532G48002S 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
147% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 56.1
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 29.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 147%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Redmi G 2022 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

System: TIMI Redmi G 2022

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback