Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '23 at 04:02
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 212
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 466
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 29
15% 20.7 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 15.5
13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$49
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 148
Write 104
Mixed 104
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.2
610% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memorex USB Flash Drive 64GB
0GB free, PID 7722
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 15
Write 1
Mixed 12.7
11% 9.57 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD44G266681 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 1.1
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback