Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	393% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '23 at 01:30
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Memory 73.3 1-Core 171 2-Core 337 102% 194 Pts	4-Core 670 8-Core 970 102% 820 Pts	64-Core 1,168 72% 1,168 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Lighting 62.2 Reflection 59.6 Parallax 81.2 51% 67.7 fps	MRender 59.6 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 43.7 45% 56.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB 10,731 User benchmarks, average bench 376% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2885 3073 3065 2754 1578 1542 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	393% Outstanding	Read 2,737 Write 3,198 Mixed 2,972 SusWrite 2,483 644% 2,847 MB/s	4K Read 69.1 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 92.9 299% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 969 DQ Write 736 DQ Mixed 889 655% 865 MB/s
Poor: 236% ↑ This bench: 393% Great: 477%
WD WD140EFGX-68B0GN0 14TB 139 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 7TB free Firmware: 85.00A85 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 160 168 179 173 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 179 Write 189 Mixed 132 SusWrite 172 124% 168 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 0.5 388% 4.53 MB/s	DQ Read 5.8 DQ Write 12.2 40% 9 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 118%
External USB3.0 DISK04 12TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 127GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 44 43 44 43 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 90 Write 100 Mixed 138 SusWrite 43.7 128% 93 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 1.2 487% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1.9 DQ Write 12.9 DQ Mixed 1 480% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 108%
External USB3.0 DISK01 14TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 44 43 44 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Read 201 Write 196 Mixed 192 SusWrite 43.6 207% 158 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 0 563% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 0 DQ Write 7.7 DQ Mixed 0.2 269% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 111%
External USB3.0 DISK02 12TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 22GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 44 43 44 43 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 189 Write 178 Mixed 192 SusWrite 43.6 198% 151 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.4 296% 8.87 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 71%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 44 43 44 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 204 Write 192 Mixed 190 SusWrite 43.6 205% 157 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.5 311% 9.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK03 12TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 411GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 43 43 44 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 184 Write 165 Mixed 108 SusWrite 43.6 158% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 1.3 451% 4.83 MB/s	DQ Read 1.5 DQ Write 15.2 DQ Mixed 1.5 574% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$20 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.4% Good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 26.2 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 25.7 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 93.9 43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $188

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $177Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,708x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,328x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,462x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $495Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,272x
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,093x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,488x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,861x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $112Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	1,121x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	875x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $38Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	778x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	736x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	653x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $991

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353