Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemHP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory4.8 GB free of 7.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '23 at 02:17
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B97
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 90.7
45% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 176
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 17
Parallax 16.2
14% 16.6 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.6
14% 17 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3E00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 112 64 53 59 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 224
Write 82.9
Mixed 196
SusWrite 82.4
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 9.4
80% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 71
DQ Mixed 13.1
20% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39%
Great: 100%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
431GB free
Firmware: JA2OA480
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 72 73 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 76.6
Write 73.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 70.8
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback