Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 22:21
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 84.7
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 143
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 206
26% 200 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 6.2
4% 7.67 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.1
6% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37/960G 960GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2428F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 240 232 365 47 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 416
Write 366
Mixed 268
SusWrite 201
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 8.6
60% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 12.9
61% 136 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC8T1-B2NS 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback