Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 17:45
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 187
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 451
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 145
Parallax 134
116% 140 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 143
Splatting 122
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$102
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 352
Write 340
Mixed 301
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 32.6
110% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 206
159% 218 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
WD My Book 25ED 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 202
Write 203
Mixed 132
224% 179 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.4
259% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 95%
WD My Book 1130 1TB
7GB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.9
Write 70.9
Mixed 55.4
84% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 993997 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $997
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback