Today's hottest deals

HP 500-422nl

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP 500-422nl  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 18 '23 at 07:14
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 57
2-Core 112
42% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 148
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 19.1
15% 18.2 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 16
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 73 39 43 45 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 118
Write 93.2
Mixed 114
SusWrite 79.9
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 25.3
95% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 157
125% 174 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 96%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB
9GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 28 28 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 52.3
Write 27.5
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 27.4
39% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.2% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-422nl Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-422nl

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback