Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 167 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 272 33% 251 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.30 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	7.09% Terrible	Lighting 7.8 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 10.2 6% 9.53 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 9.3 8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.09% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$70 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 425GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 148 159 166 173 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 179 Mixed 124 SusWrite 159 118% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.6 327% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 16GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 17 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	454x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	398x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	80x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278