Today's hottest deals

Clevo W240HU/W250HUQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo W240HU/W250HUQ  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W240HU/W250HUQ
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20111201
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 16:38
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 120
54% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 244
26% 210 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Clevo(1558 4140) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 199 201 198 194 198 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 344
Write 197
Mixed 220
SusWrite 198
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 19.3
69% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 83.9
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 216
126% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 166%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 109 104 104 105 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 72.1
Write 111
Mixed 52
SusWrite 102
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W240HU/W250HUQ Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W240HU/W250HUQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback