Medion E23401 MD61259

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion E23401 MD61259  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Iron238KR
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181213
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '23 at 21:34
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 140
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 263
31% 241 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1E39 A009) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9837
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 5.9
5% 5.17 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 9.2
6% 6.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 200 172 235 274 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 1,082
Write 749
Mixed 284
SusWrite 250
130% 591 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 17.5
57% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 373
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 166%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 122 125 126 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 114
Write 128
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 124
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-043.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.5
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E23401 MD61259 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E23401 MD61259

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback