Today's hottest deals

IBM System x3200 M2 -[436732U]-

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIBM System x3200 M2 -[436732U]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 4367
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colores, 1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '23 at 03:50
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3110-$200
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 58.2
39% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 61.5
8-Core 64.7
8% 63.1 Pts
64-Core 62.9
4% 62.9 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 2.9
4% 4.27 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 81 100 38 6.7 7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.6% Very poor
Read 86.2
Write 85.7
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 54.3
17% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 5.3
23% 7.57 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 12.8
12% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System x3200 M2 -[436732U]- Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: IBM System x3200 M2 -[436732U]-

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback