Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 22:10
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 183
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 527
50% 415 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 80.8
48% 67.1 fps
MRender 61.1
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 44.9
46% 57.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GB
88GB free
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 173 159 173 181 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 480
Write 460
Mixed 354
SusWrite 184
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 41.6
142% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 220
185% 270 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 30 41 39 22 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 117
Write 101
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 39.4
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
78GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 137 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 137
Write 124
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 138
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback