Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230130
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 21:52
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 94
2-Core 194
65% 118 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 326
42% 320 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 20.9
12% 20.6 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 24.2
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 512GB 512GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTS2818B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 241 247 353 382 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 462
Write 403
Mixed 360
SusWrite 251
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 10.7
101% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 13.8
64% 141 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 239%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
368GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 124 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 83
Write 86.1
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 124
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1118WH.003 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 25.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 21
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback