Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 20:52
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 277
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 677
74% 588 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 153A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 532.03
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 39% Great: 65%
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1539) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 6
4% 7.03 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 4
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 689 797 455 75 90 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,480
Write 1,272
Mixed 1,363
SusWrite 369
251% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 68.9
231% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 780
585% 782 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 188%
Great: 253%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
272GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1767 1640 1641 1497 1454 1448 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2208
Write 1,929
Mixed 1,598
SusWrite 1,574
410% 1,827 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 70.2
232% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 1,024
DQ Write 906
DQ Mixed 978
730% 969 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 300%
Great: 421%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.9% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 15.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback