Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion VT637AA-ABA HPE-112y

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemHp-pavilion VT637AA-ABA HPE-112y  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN ALOE
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 18:45
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 39.7
2-Core 75
42% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 106
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 8.9
6% 8.07 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.3
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 50 54 58 63 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 88.4
Write 94.2
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 53.1
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VT637AA-ABA HPE-112y Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion VT637AA-ABA HPE-112y

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback