Today's hottest deals

Aftershock N8xxEP6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAftershock N8xxEP6  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock N8xxEP6
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 15:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 185
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 454
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8500) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 6
4% 26.9 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 8.4
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 512GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 85 655 517 183 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,205
Write 1,122
Mixed 861
SusWrite 299
195% 872 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 19.1
98% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 534
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 165
202% 360 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 116%
Great: 269%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
190GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 97 91 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 78.8
Write 81.8
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 96.3
50% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GS88N26-GIIHA0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N8xxEP6 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Aftershock N8xxEP6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback