Today's hottest deals

Asrock B365M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 00:34
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 227
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 774
72% 599 Pts
64-Core 948
59% 948 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
HP(103C 8554) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.30
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 109
Parallax 126
101% 120 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 123
Splatting 103
105% 132 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$170
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 421 430 433 439 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 442
Mixed 434
SusWrite 427
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 48.3
146% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 304
244% 343 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 136%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
582GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1414 1485 1517 1588 1533 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,422
Write 1,748
Mixed 1,590
SusWrite 1,279
341% 1,510 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 58
180% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 683
DQ Mixed 750
559% 742 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 224%
Great: 365%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1TB
271GB free
Firmware: 52008100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 456 196 69 65 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 439
Write 428
Mixed 410
SusWrite 212
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 33.8
117% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 3.8
93% 222 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 25.5
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 137% - Outstanding Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback