Asus ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive604% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 01:45
Run Duration383 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$451
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 245
2-Core 487
138% 272 Pts
4-Core 927
8-Core 1,764
160% 1,345 Pts
64-Core 4,239
262% 4,239 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 128%
Great: 135%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4822 5233 5236 4665 3621 3620 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
604% Outstanding
Read 2,886
Write 4,766
Mixed 3,208
SusWrite 4,533
875% 3,848 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 278
4K Mixed 118
405% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 2,291
DQ Write 1,612
DQ Mixed 2,236
1,593% 2,046 MB/s
Poor: 246%
This bench: 604%
Great: 634%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$570
6TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 476 488 488 488 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 476
Mixed 424
SusWrite 486
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 57.8
207% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 340
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SU6SM003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4553 4656 4665 4653 4661 4663 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
613% Outstanding
Read 2,612
Write 3,719
Mixed 2,947
SusWrite 4,642
791% 3,480 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 323
4K Mixed 114
410% 166 MB/s
DQ Read 2,463
DQ Write 2,019
DQ Mixed 2,032
1,578% 2,171 MB/s
Poor: 246%
This bench: 613%
Great: 634%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 234 229 228 228 233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 135
Write 150
Mixed 107
SusWrite 230
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 1.2
9% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22%
Great: 27%
Seagate ST18000NE000-2YY101 18TB
15.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 263 267 265 266 268 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 93%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 97 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 162
Mixed 106
SusWrite 99.2
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
258% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 81%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
422GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 95 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 112
Write 121
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 95.8
137% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
982GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 96 97 96 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 135
Write 147
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 96.8
149% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.8
199% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56%
Great: 99%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
1TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 118 129 125 121 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 108
Write 123
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 123
146% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 99%
WD My Book 1230 5TB
30GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 63.7
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 69.1
84% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 63%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
38GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 92 92 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 157
Write 167
Mixed 88.1
SusWrite 92.1
165% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 99%
WD My Book 25DA 5TB
507GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 92.2
Write 88.6
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 92.4
112% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548C38-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
168% Outstanding
MC Read 66.6
MC Write 66.2
MC Mixed 63.2
187% 65.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 50.4
SC Mixed 33.6
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 168%
Great: 169%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 1,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,526
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback