Biostar H67MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar H67MH  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 08:40
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 155
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 245
31% 237 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Device(7377 150A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 168
Parallax 158
145% 168 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 134
Splatting 116
115% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 103 50 52 49 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46% Average
Read 249
Write 257
Mixed 207
SusWrite 75.5
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 24.3
95% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 77.7
DQ Mixed 33.1
32% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB F3-1600C11-8GNT 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67MH Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Biostar H67MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback