Dell Precision T3610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T3610
MotherboardDell Precision T3610  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 07:12
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 164
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 633
55% 468 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 42
Parallax 53
28% 43 fps
MRender 52.2
Gravity 34
Splatting 36
33% 40.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6305
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 375 385 373 169 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 331
Write 276
Mixed 273
SusWrite 308
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 29.5
106% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 68.7
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 122
112% 164 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
2.5TB free
Firmware: AA50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 148 149 151 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 150
Write 148
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 150
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 30.5
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3610 Builds (Compare 2,388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback