MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '23 at 20:33
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 83
1-Core 112
2-Core 229
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 667
69% 557 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (123 fps cap detected)
98% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 112
Parallax 122
100% 119 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 123
Splatting 104
94% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 66 49 53 54 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 456
Write 417
Mixed 371
SusWrite 86.4
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 34.1
108% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 241
192% 268 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 91%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1625 1710 1760 1734 1783 1733 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,932
Write 1,815
Mixed 1,774
SusWrite 1,724
408% 1,811 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 51.3
165% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 406
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 355
260% 343 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 249%
Great: 435%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 166 166 164 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 137
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 163
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FA 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 20.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback