Monster TULPAR T5 V14.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V14.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V14.1
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '23 at 22:41
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 150
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 459
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1030) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.1% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 58.4
46% 60.9 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 59.2
49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 165 147 151 155 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 320
Write 323
Mixed 322
SusWrite 176
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 32.6
97% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 298
216% 278 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 132 132 134 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
56% Above average
Read 62
Write 80.3
Mixed 69
SusWrite 133
64% 86 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD824A.C16FHP 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 25
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V14.1 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V14.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback