Aierben NA17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel NA17
MotherboardAierben NA17  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 02:01
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 173
2-Core 326
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 891
90% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,375
85% 1,375 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX1060
Device(1B50 551D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1634
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.1% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 40.6
38% 49.8 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 42.2
33% 39.4 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 240GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0312A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 414 415 416 417 416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 421
Mixed 402
SusWrite 415
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 30.9
135% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 46.2
86% 165 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-8GRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 36.5
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 26.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NA17 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Aierben NA17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback