Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 10:55
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 78
2-Core 156
52% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 269
33% 255 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$281
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 110
Parallax 126
110% 124 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 108
Splatting 92.1
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.2 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
297GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 107 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 107
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
375GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 122
Write 115
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 65.2
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback