Today's hottest deals

Sicomputer Nauta 01P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSicomputer Nauta 01P  (all builds)
MotherboardSi N150CU
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 14:21
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 209
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 418
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 1404) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.2 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 289 370 356 305 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 365
Write 345
Mixed 367
SusWrite 321
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 35.9
124% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 179
167% 260 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-H2666GST 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.8
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nauta 01P Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Sicomputer Nauta 01P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback