Lenovo 10A8S1A800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10A8S1A800  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 10:04
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 192
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 351
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 5
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 411 292 108 103 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 489
Write 434
Mixed 400
SusWrite 238
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 1.1
65% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 1.2
61% 142 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
656GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 78 79 81 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 65.8
Write 62.5
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 79.6
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
25GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 2.9 4.4 4.1 3 4.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 151
Write 8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.9
32% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Mixed 0
135% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFW0-GN-F Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.2% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A8S1A800 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10A8S1A800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback