HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime25.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 20:44
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 164
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 281
34% 261 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 18.2
15% 18 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.8
14% 17 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 284 257 250 231 221 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 452
Write 399
Mixed 391
SusWrite 256
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 38
121% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST91000640NS 81Y9731 81Y3829IBM 1TB
287GB free
Firmware: BE2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 59.7
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 58.2
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST91000640NS 81Y9731 81Y3829IBM 1TB
343GB free
Firmware: BE2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 79 81 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 85.2
Write 84.8
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 79.1
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback