Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 22:26
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$270
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 170
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 495
49% 401 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
EVGA(3842 2690) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.2% Average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 51
53% 50.2 fps
MRender 47
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 35.1
33% 41.1 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 389 398 394 332 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 50.6
Write 396
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 357
50% 216 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 16.5
52% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 77.8
70% 99.2 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 215 219 213 218 220 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 117%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 99 100 99 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 133
Write 141
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 98.7
70% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
753GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 75 75 77 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 73
Write 73.8
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 75.8
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 146 149 140 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 93.8
Write 102
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 146
72% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2000EL Series 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
67.8% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 24.2
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback