Dell OptiPlex 3010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 3010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3010  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 01 '23 at 06:50
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 173
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 296
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 18
Parallax 18.7
15% 18.2 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 16.5
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 90 73 91 91 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.2% Above average
Read 214
Write 204
Mixed 189
SusWrite 95.2
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 30.8
99% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 146
123% 179 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 108%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
501GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 120 124 122 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 121
Write 119
Mixed 59
SusWrite 121
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 01BA 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3010 Builds (Compare 4,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback