HP ZBook 15 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 15 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 842A
Memory18 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '23 at 01:16
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 41.4
2-Core 78.8
35% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 253
24% 202 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 842A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 5.8
4% 14.8 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 8.2
5% 5.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 842A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.4% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 22.3
22% 27.7 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 19.4
20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 562 500 277 298 476 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 284
Write 507
Mixed 393
SusWrite 445
93% 407 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 11.2
41% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 93.2
60% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 295%
S3u3 SSD 512GB
345GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 10 9.5 9.8 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
1.31% Terrible
Read 2.2
Write 15.7
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 12
2% 8.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
2% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 G5 Builds (Compare 1,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback