Today's hottest deals

Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130128
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 03:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 135
58% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 186
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7470
Dell(1028 2120) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 2.7
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 128 58 113 59 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.8% Below average
Read 17.7
Write 143
Mixed 11
SusWrite 90.8
15% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 26
70% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 119
94% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
278GB free
Firmware: PC4OC72E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 79 79 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 73.9
Write 77
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 78.4
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback