Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210623
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 01:50
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 75.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 281
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 808
82% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 113
Parallax 117
104% 119 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 102
Splatting 84.4
86% 108 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0521A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1237 1272 1252 1290 639 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,783
Write 1,526
Mixed 1,193
SusWrite 982
307% 1,371 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 35.1
222% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 431
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 422
407% 621 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 228%
Great: 234%
Seagate ST4000NM0035 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SN07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 144 151 165 164 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 163
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 158
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST4000NM0035 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 171 173 174 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 158
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 174
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6 6 6 6 5.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 52.2
Write 8.7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 5.9
18% 19 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
77% 6.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G HX424C15FB2/8-SP 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.6% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 29.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 28.4
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback