Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55-M  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120904
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 14 '23 at 15:57
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 95.3
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 185
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 383
46% 352 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gainward(10B0 1287) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 9.4
7% 8.77 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 221 203 187 162 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.5% Very good
Read 231
Write 225
Mixed 246
SusWrite 188
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 42.8
140% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 183
129% 164 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 128%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150
26GB free
Firmware: 20.00K20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 28 18 26 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 63.8
Write 24.8
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 26
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 33%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$34
200GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 108 108 111 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 134
Write 91.6
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 111
67% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55-M Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback